One TwoThree I’ve always floated elements to remove the whitespace personally, though if this has been infeasible for some reason… I irritate my pedanticism and simply place all the LI tags on one long line, HTML comments seems to be a better method. – Chrome 19 Windows In Addition if need to remove unnecessary span you can use :nth-of-type. Solution 1: Remove Space Between Elements Here’s the deal: a series of inline-block elements formatted like you normally format HTML will have spaces in between them. Here’s the big reveal: I rarely ever have to deal with the whitespace issue discussed here, and that’s because it’s easy to design interfaces that don’t require zero whitespace between elements. The danger with this is browsers could easily see it as a bug and fix it, and there went your layout. For example, the navigation list items displayed inline-block appear to have small, un-clickable gaps between … Now for some applications this is fine, but when it comes down to pixel perfect layout mo-jo, it has a few downsides: 1. Then, what was perfect can now be broken. Pixel perfection (I’m assuming your mean zero spacing) CAN be achieved with inline-block. Leaving off the closing tag looks like the most elegant solution to me (though I wasn’t even aware it was allowed!). Just try to avoid designs that require zero spacing; it’s easier than you think. @Jeffri I still don’t understand the argument though. It looks much cleaner, and it’s much easier to read. Use the :nth-child() pseudo-class so as to put style to the next two
tags. – Firefox 12 Ubuntu That is why I prefer the ‘word-spacing’ method. Wrap your elements inside a container then use CSS GRID, course and then use grid-gap:value that was created for your that specific purpose, As for your problem, you should use the row example. I’ve created a compressor for Jekyll. I will never thought that the point was because (\n) or (spaces) between html tags. I try to always use inline-block, as it is in a sense, more semantic than float and also it doesn’t break any flow nor I need to add clearfix and such. Correct methood is removal of whitespace in the html markup at whatever methood you feel looks best. Is it weird to display ads on an academic website? Forcing inline-block Elements on One Line. For example, 10px might be too much space for a 12pt font and way too little for an 80pt font. Removing white space using flex-box. In this article, we'll examine HTML inline-level elements and how they differ from block-level elements. “Where would you like these 2 sofas mate?” “The element is closed on the occurrence of the next
tags should not resolve this issue (that is, the spaces should not go away). Still one pixel of whitespace is between the elements. They aren’t exactly interchangeable layout models or anything, but you might get what you need out of it. They couldn’t be more simple. I just don’t design layouts that rely on zero space between elements. That’s it. For example, in IE 7-9 Maybe I’m just weird like that. An inline element does not start on a new line and only takes up as much width as necessary. By the way, Justin, I completely agree with all of your comments! Some tags do not have a closing tag. I noticed that the math for these block elements wasn’t quite adding up—the element width + padding + margin + border should’ve enabled three items on one line; however, the elements were wrapping. It’s that simple. “I’d love to see some examples of your websites where you’ve designed “knowing inline-block will be used”.”. With it, you can write white-space: none; in your external CSS. I know I’m doing it wrong with absolute AP Divs by moving them downwards every time a new story comes in. I believe I was successful in meeting those requirements in this jsFiddle: The following browsers were tested and performed as expected: – IE 6, 7, 8 Is it good practice to echo PHP code into inline JS? The source of the problem is that HTML compresses all space characters—tabs, spaces, and carriage returns—to one character. Floats aren’t designed to be used for a navigation or things like that, inline-blocks is definitely the way to go. }. this litle space is the only issue, i use the ident method to correct the problem. rev 2021.2.9.38523, Stack Overflow works best with JavaScript enabled, Where developers & technologists share private knowledge with coworkers, Programming & related technical career opportunities, Recruit tech talent & build your employer brand, Reach developers & technologists worldwide. I always use inline-block, prety useful, i can determine the child align with the text-align property, center, left, right. My cross-browser testing is very easy, and everything is as it should be, the world is right. Great topic. If you do have a situation that requires it, just throw in the comment method or don’t place returns between elements. Floats aren’t ideal either as they mess up the vertical baseline when trying to align inline-block elements of different line-heights. You speak of designing knowing inline-block will be used: I surely hope you don’t mean you’re basing your designs on the use of inline-block rather than what the UX / branding / design calls for. HTML5 will close them for you!”. @Landis and @Julian: You guys may want to reconsider the negative margin technique. If you design right, the majority of the time you shouldn’t have to worry about the white-space at all, and when you do, it’s a very easy fix. Each web page is connected to other web pages using hyperlinks. but that makes the code really unmanageable. In fact, optional tags are a big advantage of HTML because they just provide several correct ways to mark up the same robust and predictable DOM structure. I only use this when the list items need to be centered though. For example, with "extra space" we have the following code in our HTML. The YUI 3 CSS Grids use letter-spacing and word-spacing on their grid container to collapse white-space between the grid units. but the negative margin fix doesnt work on Chrome either!! I use floated blocks for everything else. Those were the days! font-size: 0 is a completely unusable solution if you want to use ems or % in any of your child elements. It’s only an issue if you have source code line breaks. Beautifully simple techniques to fix it! Inline-block is *the* way to layout a page. I’ve met this problem quite often, but haven’t found any article saying about this, until now. Plus, by using the HTML syntax above, I don’t have to mess with browser inconsistencies and crazy hacks. Minimized HTML will solve this problem, or one of these tricks: They’re all pretty funky, but it does the trick. WTF?!”. From the piano tuner's viewpoint, what needs to be done in order to achieve "equal temperament"? Here’s some ways to fight the gap and get inline-block elements sitting directly next to each other. Thanks. Man, CSS is a depressing medium to work in. Just saying… I have used the YUI grid system for over a year now and have had no problems. When I switched over to inline-block, my development time drastically decreased. I use the following to tame the whole issue without much ado. The spaces between inline-blocks are no different. I’d love to see some examples of your websites where you’ve designed “knowing inline-block will be used”. The space-between value distributes the items evenly (with space between them) in the line. So yes, removing spaces between the tags solve the issues immediatly. It’s more about just changing how you solve design problems. The font size thing look a good solution but I wonder about what google does if it sees font-size:0? To get all elements to appear on one line the easiest way is to: Set white-space property to nowrap on a parent element that has overflow-x: auto set to show horizontal scrollbars. When specifying separate sides, you don't need to set each value. with floats we might need to clear the float with some addition unnessecary html something like . Sreejesh KV, such a sollution is definitely better than a negative margin :) Especially when the elements need to be alined left where the negative-margin method would shift the first list item too. And my code that output the HTML is pretty well formated. I’m *not* talking about altering the aesthetic or brand of the interface to allow inline-block, I’m talking about changing how you solve problems that designs present. One problem that arrises when you use inline-block is that whitespace in HTML becomes visual space on screen. The spaces between these blocks are just like spaces between words. – Safari 5.1.7 Windows This isn’t a “bug” (I don’t think). This is how I do it. Suit to taste. @Taufix I don’t think that is totally correct. Funky formatting and extraneous CSS feels hackish. This bugs in Firefox in floats, so better separate letter-spacing to Webkit-only browsers. To set a common-width margin around the box, use an expression like blockquote{margin: 20px; } That will push everything away from the element by 20 pixels in every direction. I do float the elements, it works, but other solutions mentioned in this article sounds great, too. Create a
tag, which is used for specifying an unordered list. However, while using the display: inline-block; the whitespace in the HTML code creates some visual space on the screen. Thank you for this topic!! My findings led me to what Geert De Deckere posted as the best way to solve the problem. I owe you a beer at least! Thank you! From where you know that the size of a single space is 0.25em? Some families do have an exact white space, like Courier New. I wasn’t even aware there were other ways and thought float was the right way to do it. This very, very simple work-around gets inline-block working all the way down to IE6 and is only presented to the very browsers that need it. http://yui.yahooapis.com/3.5.0/build/cssgrids/grids.css. Don’t they have more things to do rather than this? I also think it’s better to use the HTML way (no carriage return or HTML comments) because every CSS method rely on browser inconsistencies, which is as we know, not very reliable. Of course, I would prefer using the comment or splitting the tag method. word-spacing: -1em; Worry not! Inline-blocks are just so convenient for that, but if there is a way I can do it with floats, I’d love to know how. I think   is the best answer for what you're searching, if you don't use divs to "store" that menus. Since floats are inherently buggy since they’re taken out of document flow, different browsers have to decide how to render them and their interaction with other elements. The element is closed on the occurrence of the next (or element. I always use the floating method. I’m gonna try ur suggestions now This has bugged me to no end for a long time. Google using inline-block for almost everything. And for those who says that my code becomes hard to read, I usually use any dev-tool available (usually in Chrome, but could be firebug in Firefox for example) which automagically converts and clean up the HTML. So something to consider if you are looking for a production ready solution. By combing these rules, we should be able to eliminate unwanted spacing in many of the modern browsers and maybe a few older ones as well. if you are using html ( NOT XHTML – important ), then the LI elements ( google for more of those ) will be closed automatically and will have no spacing ( no empty text node ), check http://jsfiddle.net/stryju/6S5N8/ for explaination. The inline-blocks act the same as text-characters, so text-align works flawlessly in manipulating their position. – Breaking the tags: I really hate this.. seems to me broken HTML… I don’t even use word wrap because of that Thank’s a lot! Never tried but a polyfill is a common solution to tricky issues. Chevy Vega For Sale Near Me,
How To Turn Off Screen Time Without Password,
Cold Dish - Crossword Clue,
Apics Certification Worth It Reddit,
How To Apply For Cares Act,
Short Sales Cedar City Utah,
Itty Bitty Kitty Volunteer,
" />
One TwoThree I’ve always floated elements to remove the whitespace personally, though if this has been infeasible for some reason… I irritate my pedanticism and simply place all the LI tags on one long line, HTML comments seems to be a better method. – Chrome 19 Windows In Addition if need to remove unnecessary span you can use :nth-of-type. Solution 1: Remove Space Between Elements Here’s the deal: a series of inline-block elements formatted like you normally format HTML will have spaces in between them. Here’s the big reveal: I rarely ever have to deal with the whitespace issue discussed here, and that’s because it’s easy to design interfaces that don’t require zero whitespace between elements. The danger with this is browsers could easily see it as a bug and fix it, and there went your layout. For example, the navigation list items displayed inline-block appear to have small, un-clickable gaps between … Now for some applications this is fine, but when it comes down to pixel perfect layout mo-jo, it has a few downsides: 1. Then, what was perfect can now be broken. Pixel perfection (I’m assuming your mean zero spacing) CAN be achieved with inline-block. Leaving off the closing tag looks like the most elegant solution to me (though I wasn’t even aware it was allowed!). Just try to avoid designs that require zero spacing; it’s easier than you think. @Jeffri I still don’t understand the argument though. It looks much cleaner, and it’s much easier to read. Use the :nth-child() pseudo-class so as to put style to the next two
tags. – Firefox 12 Ubuntu That is why I prefer the ‘word-spacing’ method. Wrap your elements inside a container then use CSS GRID, course and then use grid-gap:value that was created for your that specific purpose, As for your problem, you should use the row example. I’ve created a compressor for Jekyll. I will never thought that the point was because (\n) or (spaces) between html tags. I try to always use inline-block, as it is in a sense, more semantic than float and also it doesn’t break any flow nor I need to add clearfix and such. Correct methood is removal of whitespace in the html markup at whatever methood you feel looks best. Is it weird to display ads on an academic website? Forcing inline-block Elements on One Line. For example, 10px might be too much space for a 12pt font and way too little for an 80pt font. Removing white space using flex-box. In this article, we'll examine HTML inline-level elements and how they differ from block-level elements. “Where would you like these 2 sofas mate?” “The element is closed on the occurrence of the next
tag, which is used for specifying an unordered list. However, while using the display: inline-block; the whitespace in the HTML code creates some visual space on the screen. Thank you for this topic!! My findings led me to what Geert De Deckere posted as the best way to solve the problem. I owe you a beer at least! Thank you! From where you know that the size of a single space is 0.25em? Some families do have an exact white space, like Courier New. I wasn’t even aware there were other ways and thought float was the right way to do it. This very, very simple work-around gets inline-block working all the way down to IE6 and is only presented to the very browsers that need it. http://yui.yahooapis.com/3.5.0/build/cssgrids/grids.css. Don’t they have more things to do rather than this? I also think it’s better to use the HTML way (no carriage return or HTML comments) because every CSS method rely on browser inconsistencies, which is as we know, not very reliable. Of course, I would prefer using the comment or splitting the tag method. word-spacing: -1em; Worry not! Inline-blocks are just so convenient for that, but if there is a way I can do it with floats, I’d love to know how. I think   is the best answer for what you're searching, if you don't use divs to "store" that menus. Since floats are inherently buggy since they’re taken out of document flow, different browsers have to decide how to render them and their interaction with other elements. The element is closed on the occurrence of the next (or element. I always use the floating method. I’m gonna try ur suggestions now This has bugged me to no end for a long time. Google using inline-block for almost everything. And for those who says that my code becomes hard to read, I usually use any dev-tool available (usually in Chrome, but could be firebug in Firefox for example) which automagically converts and clean up the HTML. So something to consider if you are looking for a production ready solution. By combing these rules, we should be able to eliminate unwanted spacing in many of the modern browsers and maybe a few older ones as well. if you are using html ( NOT XHTML – important ), then the LI elements ( google for more of those ) will be closed automatically and will have no spacing ( no empty text node ), check http://jsfiddle.net/stryju/6S5N8/ for explaination. The inline-blocks act the same as text-characters, so text-align works flawlessly in manipulating their position. – Breaking the tags: I really hate this.. seems to me broken HTML… I don’t even use word wrap because of that Thank’s a lot! Never tried but a polyfill is a common solution to tricky issues. Chevy Vega For Sale Near Me,
How To Turn Off Screen Time Without Password,
Cold Dish - Crossword Clue,
Apics Certification Worth It Reddit,
How To Apply For Cares Act,
Short Sales Cedar City Utah,
Itty Bitty Kitty Volunteer,
" />
Skip to content
display: inline-flex; flex-wrap: wrap;} We use inline-flex so we can have flex items but display our parent element as an inline element instead of a block element. I think there is a design where pixel perfect is important and that is where I find float to be better. Can you Ready an attack with the trigger 'enemy enters my reach'? Once you “convert” over, your development time will noticebly decrease. In this article, we will show how you can adjust the spacing between items of HTML lists, either increasing or decreasing the spacing between items. The
element is an unstyled tag, in other words, using it does not change the look of an HTML element. Thanks for your explanation. I haven’t arrived to a perfect CSS solution yet. I think it’s just habit, and no one has come along, kicked them in the arse and told them to break it. In other words: I’ve always floated elements to remove the whitespace personally, though if this has been infeasible for some reason… I irritate my pedanticism and simply place all the LI tags on one long line, HTML comments seems to be a better method. – Chrome 19 Windows In Addition if need to remove unnecessary span you can use :nth-of-type. Solution 1: Remove Space Between Elements Here’s the deal: a series of inline-block elements formatted like you normally format HTML will have spaces in between them. Here’s the big reveal: I rarely ever have to deal with the whitespace issue discussed here, and that’s because it’s easy to design interfaces that don’t require zero whitespace between elements. The danger with this is browsers could easily see it as a bug and fix it, and there went your layout. For example, the navigation list items displayed inline-block appear to have small, un-clickable gaps between … Now for some applications this is fine, but when it comes down to pixel perfect layout mo-jo, it has a few downsides: 1. Then, what was perfect can now be broken. Pixel perfection (I’m assuming your mean zero spacing) CAN be achieved with inline-block. Leaving off the closing tag looks like the most elegant solution to me (though I wasn’t even aware it was allowed!). Just try to avoid designs that require zero spacing; it’s easier than you think. @Jeffri I still don’t understand the argument though. It looks much cleaner, and it’s much easier to read. Use the :nth-child() pseudo-class so as to put style to the next two
tags. – Firefox 12 Ubuntu That is why I prefer the ‘word-spacing’ method. Wrap your elements inside a container then use CSS GRID, course and then use grid-gap:value that was created for your that specific purpose, As for your problem, you should use the row example. I’ve created a compressor for Jekyll. I will never thought that the point was because (\n) or (spaces) between html tags. I try to always use inline-block, as it is in a sense, more semantic than float and also it doesn’t break any flow nor I need to add clearfix and such. Correct methood is removal of whitespace in the html markup at whatever methood you feel looks best. Is it weird to display ads on an academic website? Forcing inline-block Elements on One Line. For example, 10px might be too much space for a 12pt font and way too little for an 80pt font. Removing white space using flex-box. In this article, we'll examine HTML inline-level elements and how they differ from block-level elements. “Where would you like these 2 sofas mate?” “The element is closed on the occurrence of the next
tags should not resolve this issue (that is, the spaces should not go away). Still one pixel of whitespace is between the elements. They aren’t exactly interchangeable layout models or anything, but you might get what you need out of it. They couldn’t be more simple. I just don’t design layouts that rely on zero space between elements. That’s it. For example, in IE 7-9 Maybe I’m just weird like that. An inline element does not start on a new line and only takes up as much width as necessary. By the way, Justin, I completely agree with all of your comments! Some tags do not have a closing tag. I noticed that the math for these block elements wasn’t quite adding up—the element width + padding + margin + border should’ve enabled three items on one line; however, the elements were wrapping. It’s that simple. “I’d love to see some examples of your websites where you’ve designed “knowing inline-block will be used”.”. With it, you can write white-space: none; in your external CSS. I know I’m doing it wrong with absolute AP Divs by moving them downwards every time a new story comes in. I believe I was successful in meeting those requirements in this jsFiddle: The following browsers were tested and performed as expected: – IE 6, 7, 8 Is it good practice to echo PHP code into inline JS? The source of the problem is that HTML compresses all space characters—tabs, spaces, and carriage returns—to one character. Floats aren’t designed to be used for a navigation or things like that, inline-blocks is definitely the way to go. }. this litle space is the only issue, i use the ident method to correct the problem. rev 2021.2.9.38523, Stack Overflow works best with JavaScript enabled, Where developers & technologists share private knowledge with coworkers, Programming & related technical career opportunities, Recruit tech talent & build your employer brand, Reach developers & technologists worldwide. I always use inline-block, prety useful, i can determine the child align with the text-align property, center, left, right. My cross-browser testing is very easy, and everything is as it should be, the world is right. Great topic. If you do have a situation that requires it, just throw in the comment method or don’t place returns between elements. Floats aren’t ideal either as they mess up the vertical baseline when trying to align inline-block elements of different line-heights. You speak of designing knowing inline-block will be used: I surely hope you don’t mean you’re basing your designs on the use of inline-block rather than what the UX / branding / design calls for. HTML5 will close them for you!”. @Landis and @Julian: You guys may want to reconsider the negative margin technique. If you design right, the majority of the time you shouldn’t have to worry about the white-space at all, and when you do, it’s a very easy fix. Each web page is connected to other web pages using hyperlinks. but that makes the code really unmanageable. In fact, optional tags are a big advantage of HTML because they just provide several correct ways to mark up the same robust and predictable DOM structure. I only use this when the list items need to be centered though. For example, with "extra space" we have the following code in our HTML. The YUI 3 CSS Grids use letter-spacing and word-spacing on their grid container to collapse white-space between the grid units. but the negative margin fix doesnt work on Chrome either!! I use floated blocks for everything else. Those were the days! font-size: 0 is a completely unusable solution if you want to use ems or % in any of your child elements. It’s only an issue if you have source code line breaks. Beautifully simple techniques to fix it! Inline-block is *the* way to layout a page. I’ve met this problem quite often, but haven’t found any article saying about this, until now. Plus, by using the HTML syntax above, I don’t have to mess with browser inconsistencies and crazy hacks. Minimized HTML will solve this problem, or one of these tricks: They’re all pretty funky, but it does the trick. WTF?!”. From the piano tuner's viewpoint, what needs to be done in order to achieve "equal temperament"? Here’s some ways to fight the gap and get inline-block elements sitting directly next to each other. Thanks. Man, CSS is a depressing medium to work in. Just saying… I have used the YUI grid system for over a year now and have had no problems. When I switched over to inline-block, my development time drastically decreased. I use the following to tame the whole issue without much ado. The spaces between inline-blocks are no different. I’d love to see some examples of your websites where you’ve designed “knowing inline-block will be used”. The space-between value distributes the items evenly (with space between them) in the line. So yes, removing spaces between the tags solve the issues immediatly. It’s more about just changing how you solve design problems. The font size thing look a good solution but I wonder about what google does if it sees font-size:0? To get all elements to appear on one line the easiest way is to: Set white-space property to nowrap on a parent element that has overflow-x: auto set to show horizontal scrollbars. When specifying separate sides, you don't need to set each value. with floats we might need to clear the float with some addition unnessecary html something like . Sreejesh KV, such a sollution is definitely better than a negative margin :) Especially when the elements need to be alined left where the negative-margin method would shift the first list item too. And my code that output the HTML is pretty well formated. I’m *not* talking about altering the aesthetic or brand of the interface to allow inline-block, I’m talking about changing how you solve problems that designs present. One problem that arrises when you use inline-block is that whitespace in HTML becomes visual space on screen. The spaces between these blocks are just like spaces between words. – Safari 5.1.7 Windows This isn’t a “bug” (I don’t think). This is how I do it. Suit to taste. @Taufix I don’t think that is totally correct. Funky formatting and extraneous CSS feels hackish. This bugs in Firefox in floats, so better separate letter-spacing to Webkit-only browsers. To set a common-width margin around the box, use an expression like blockquote{margin: 20px; } That will push everything away from the element by 20 pixels in every direction. I do float the elements, it works, but other solutions mentioned in this article sounds great, too. Create a
tag, which is used for specifying an unordered list. However, while using the display: inline-block; the whitespace in the HTML code creates some visual space on the screen. Thank you for this topic!! My findings led me to what Geert De Deckere posted as the best way to solve the problem. I owe you a beer at least! Thank you! From where you know that the size of a single space is 0.25em? Some families do have an exact white space, like Courier New. I wasn’t even aware there were other ways and thought float was the right way to do it. This very, very simple work-around gets inline-block working all the way down to IE6 and is only presented to the very browsers that need it. http://yui.yahooapis.com/3.5.0/build/cssgrids/grids.css. Don’t they have more things to do rather than this? I also think it’s better to use the HTML way (no carriage return or HTML comments) because every CSS method rely on browser inconsistencies, which is as we know, not very reliable. Of course, I would prefer using the comment or splitting the tag method. word-spacing: -1em; Worry not! Inline-blocks are just so convenient for that, but if there is a way I can do it with floats, I’d love to know how. I think   is the best answer for what you're searching, if you don't use divs to "store" that menus. Since floats are inherently buggy since they’re taken out of document flow, different browsers have to decide how to render them and their interaction with other elements. The element is closed on the occurrence of the next (or element. I always use the floating method. I’m gonna try ur suggestions now This has bugged me to no end for a long time. Google using inline-block for almost everything. And for those who says that my code becomes hard to read, I usually use any dev-tool available (usually in Chrome, but could be firebug in Firefox for example) which automagically converts and clean up the HTML. So something to consider if you are looking for a production ready solution. By combing these rules, we should be able to eliminate unwanted spacing in many of the modern browsers and maybe a few older ones as well. if you are using html ( NOT XHTML – important ), then the LI elements ( google for more of those ) will be closed automatically and will have no spacing ( no empty text node ), check http://jsfiddle.net/stryju/6S5N8/ for explaination. The inline-blocks act the same as text-characters, so text-align works flawlessly in manipulating their position. – Breaking the tags: I really hate this.. seems to me broken HTML… I don’t even use word wrap because of that Thank’s a lot! Never tried but a polyfill is a common solution to tricky issues.